The short answer
Clover wins quick service: published rates from 2.3% plus 10 cents and plans near $135 a month with reseller install and support. Toast wins full service: restaurant-grade hardware and kitchen workflow on published $0 or $69 plans at 2.49% to 3.09% plus 15 cents. Service style, not brand loyalty, decides it.
How Do Clover and Toast Compare on Published Numbers?
Both publish enough to settle the economics before a single demo.
| Clover | Toast | |
|---|---|---|
| Software | QSR plans from about $135 a month, published | $0 Starter or $69 Point of Sale, published |
| In-person rate | 2.3% to 2.6% plus 10 cents by plan | 3.09% plus 15 cents on $0 plan; 2.49% plus 15 cents on $69 plan |
| Online | 3.5% plus 10 cents keyed, published | 3.50% plus 15 cents, published |
| Hardware | Stations, minis, handhelds via resellers | Restaurant-grade wired terminals, KDS, handhelds |
| Contract | Reseller-dependent; month to month possible | Commonly two-year terms |
| Best fit | Counter service, cafes, delis | Full service, bars, multi-station kitchens |
What Does a Restaurant's Volume Cost on Each?
A counter-service spot doing $45,000 a month across 2,250 tickets:
Clover QSR plan at the published 2.3% plus 10 cents: $1,035 plus $225, plus about $135 software. Roughly $1,395.
Toast on the $69 plan at 2.49% plus 15 cents: $1,120 plus $338, plus $69. Roughly $1,527.
Clover clears about $130 a month at this profile. Shift the same volume to full service with fewer, larger checks, 900 checks at $50, and the per-item fee gap narrows to about $50 while Toast's kitchen tooling starts earning its keep. The published math genuinely flips with service style, which is the honest headline of this comparison.
When Does Each Platform Win Beyond the Math?
Toast earns full-service rooms: coursing, seat-level ordering, KDS routing, and handhelds built for a packed floor, with hardware that survives grease and heat. Its two-year terms are the price of that fit; read them.
Clover earns counters: fast setup, published low QSR rates, hardware from mini to full station, and a local reseller who installs, builds the menu, and answers during service. Its risk is reseller variance, so the agreement behind the hardware deserves more scrutiny than the hardware.
Neither answers your phone during a rush; both integrate with AI phone ordering, which for phone-heavy spots moves more revenue than the platform choice.
How Should You Run the Decision?
Five checks, in order.
- Classify your service style honestly; it decides most of the comparison
- Run both published rate structures on your real ticket profile, as above
- Toast: read the term length and exit costs before the demo impresses you
- Clover: identify the actual reseller and get their terms in writing
- Test your messiest order and your phone-order flow in both demos
Commonly Asked Questions
- Is Clover cheaper than Toast?
- For counter service, usually: published QSR rates from 2.3% plus 10 cents beat Toast's 2.49% to 3.09% plus 15 cents on small tickets even after Clover's software fee. For full service at larger checks the gap narrows and Toast's tooling often justifies the difference.
- Does Toast really cost $0?
- The Starter software is $0 with published processing at 3.09% plus 15 cents; the paid $69 plan processes at 2.49% plus 15 cents. Above roughly $12,000 a month, the rate spread costs more than the subscription, so the free plan is a starter, not a strategy.
- Can I move from Clover to Toast or back?
- Yes, with real switching costs: menu rebuilds, staff retraining, and any contract exit fees. Confirm hardware ownership and term status before planning a move, and time it to a slow season.
- Which does BatchOut recommend?
- BatchOut carries both and matches by service style and volume: Clover for most counter-service economics, Toast where full-service workflow earns its contract, with nationwide install and support behind either.
Keep reading